Unlike bonds, common stock valuation is more challenging because future cash flows are not known in advance, the investment has an indefinite life, and the market's required rate of return is not easily observable. However, the value of a stock is the present value of all its expected future dividends.
The price of a stock today, $P_0$, is the present value of all its future dividends, $D_1, D_2, D_3, \dots$, discounted at the required return, $R$.
This model assumes that dividends grow at a constant rate, $g$, indefinitely. This simplification allows us to value the stock as a growing perpetuity. This is also known as the Gordon Growth Model.
Where $D_1$ is the dividend expected next period, $D_0$ is the dividend just paid, $R$ is the required return, and $g$ is the constant growth rate.
For a firm with a supernormal growth rate for a finite period before settling into a constant growth phase, we use a two-stage approach. First, we find the present value of the dividends during the high-growth period. Then, we calculate the stock price at the start of the constant growth phase and discount that back to today.
Where $P_t$ is the stock price at time $t$ when constant growth begins. This is calculated using the Dividend Growth Model:
$$P_t = \frac{D_{t+1}}{R-g} = \frac{D_t(1+g)}{R-g}$$The total required return, $R$, can be broken down into two components: the dividend yield and the capital gains yield.
Where $\frac{D_1}{P_0}$ is the dividend yield and $g$ is the capital gains yield (equal to the constant growth rate).
For companies that don't pay dividends, valuation can be based on multiples of earnings or sales. The most common is the Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio.
The value of a share of stock is the present value of the expected future dividends. For a long-term investor, the only cash flows received from a stock are the dividends. The final selling price of the stock is also determined by the present value of its future dividends at that point in time.
The value of these stocks is based on the expectation that they will start paying dividends at some point in the future. The company is likely reinvesting all its earnings back into the business to fuel growth. Investors believe this growth will eventually lead to larger dividends (or a higher future selling price) than if the company paid dividends today.
A company might choose not to pay dividends if it has profitable growth opportunities that require reinvesting all its earnings. This strategy is often employed by young, fast-growing companies that need capital for expansion and research and development.
The two assumptions are:
1. Dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate, $g$, forever.
2. The constant growth rate, $g$, is less than the required return, $R$.
The constant growth assumption is more reasonable for mature, stable companies like utilities. For younger, rapidly growing companies, it is not a realistic assumption for the immediate future. The second assumption is a mathematical requirement; if $g \geq R$, the model produces a non-sensical or infinite stock price.
The preferred stock will likely have a higher price. Preferred stock has a fixed dividend in perpetuity, similar to a zero-growth common stock. However, preferred stock holders have preference over common stock holders in dividend payments and liquidation, which makes their cash flows more secure. As a result, the required return on preferred stock is typically lower than on common stock, leading to a higher present value (price) for the same dividend amount.
The two components are the dividend yield ($D_1/P_0$) and the capital gains yield ($g$). The capital gains yield is typically larger for most stocks, especially for growth companies that reinvest a large portion of their earnings and pay small or no dividends.
Yes, it is true. The dividend growth model implicitly assumes that the stock price will grow at the same constant rate as the dividends. This is because the valuation formula is a function of the next period's dividend, which is constantly increasing at a rate of $g$.
In a political democracy, it's generally "one person, one vote." In corporate democracy, it's "one share, one vote." This means that in a corporation, an individual's voting power is proportional to the number of shares they own, not their status as an individual person.
This is a highly debated topic. From one perspective, it is not unfair because investors are fully aware of the voting rights (or lack thereof) when they purchase the stock. From another perspective, it can be seen as unfair as it allows a small group of insiders to maintain control without a proportionate financial stake, which can make management less accountable to outside investors.
Investors buy non-voting stock primarily for the capital appreciation and dividends, not for the voting rights. They are betting on the company's future growth and profitability, which they expect will increase the stock price. The founders or insiders who retain the voting control are often trusted by these investors to make sound decisions for the long-term benefit of the company.
Given: $D_0 = \$3.20$, $g = 4\% = 0.04$, $R = 10.5\% = 0.105$.
Current Price ($P_0$):
Price in 3 years ($P_3$):
Note: The slight difference is due to rounding in the intermediate steps. Both methods are correct.
Price in 15 years ($P_{15}$):
Given: $D_1 = \$1.87$, $g = 4.3\% = 0.043$, $P_0 = \$37$.
Required Return ($R$):
Dividend Yield:
Capital Gains Yield:
Given: $D_1 = \$3.04$, $g = 3.75\% = 0.0375$, $R = 11\% = 0.11$.
Current Price ($P_0$):
Given: $g = 3.4\% = 0.034$, Dividend Yield = $5.3\% = 0.053$.
Required Return ($R$):
Given: $P_0 = \$78$, $R = 10.9\% = 0.109$. Total return is split evenly between capital gains yield ($g$) and dividend yield ($D_1/P_0$).
Step 1: Find the dividend yield and capital gains yield.
Since $R = \text{Dividend Yield} + \text{Capital Gains Yield}$ and they are equal, each is $0.109 / 2 = 0.0545$. So, $g = 5.45\%$ and $D_1/P_0 = 5.45\%$.
Step 2: Find the next dividend ($D_1$).
Step 3: Find the current dividend ($D_0$).
We know that $D_1 = D_0(1+g)$, so $D_0 = D_1 / (1+g)$.
Given: Constant dividend of $D = \$9.45$ for 13 years, $R = 10.7\% = 0.107$.
This is a an annuity problem. We need to find the present value of a 13-year annuity with a payment of \$9.45 per year.
Given: Dividend = $D = \$3.80$, Price = $P_0 = \$93$.
Preferred stock is a perpetuity. The formula for the value of a perpetuity is $P_0 = D/R$. We can rearrange this to solve for $R$.
Given: $D_1 = \$4.15$, $g = 4\% = 0.04$.
Red, Inc.: $R = 8\% = 0.08$
Yellow Corp.: $R = 11\% = 0.11$
Blue Company: $R = 14\% = 0.14$
Conclusion: As the required return ($R$) increases, the stock price ($P_0$) decreases, assuming all other variables remain constant. This is an inverse relationship.
Given: Total shares outstanding = 720,000, Price per share = \$48.
With straight voting, a simple majority of votes is required to elect a director, which means you need to own 50% + 1 share of the company's stock to guarantee a seat. Since you are the only one voting for yourself, you need to own enough shares to have a majority of all outstanding shares.
Shares needed = $(720,000 / 2) + 1 = 360,001$
Cost = $360,001 \times \$48 = \textbf{\$17,280,048}$
Given: Total shares outstanding = 720,000, Price per share = \$48, Number of seats = 4.
With cumulative voting, the number of shares required to guarantee a seat is calculated as: $1 / (N+1)$ of the total shares outstanding, plus one share, where $N$ is the number of directors up for election.
Cost = $144,001 \times \$48 = \textbf{\$6,912,048}$
Given: EPS = \$3.64.
Using the formula $P = \text{PE} \times \text{EPS}$.
Case 1: Benchmark PE = 18
Case 2: Benchmark PE = 21
Given: Total sales = \$2.7 million, Shares outstanding = 175,000.
Step 1: Calculate Sales per Share.
Step 2: Calculate stock price using Price-Sales Ratio.
Using the formula $P = \text{Price-Sales Ratio} \times \text{Sales per Share}$.
Case 1: Price-Sales Ratio = 4.3
Case 2: Price-Sales Ratio = 3.6
Given: $D_0 = \$2.65$, $g_1 = 30\% = 0.30$ (for 3 years), $g_2 = 4\% = 0.04$ (indefinitely), $R = 10\% = 0.10$.
Step 1: Calculate dividends for the supernormal growth period.
Step 2: Calculate the stock price at the end of the supernormal growth period ($P_3$).
This is when the constant growth rate begins. We use the dividend at time 4 ($D_4$) and the constant growth formula.
Step 3: Calculate the present value of the dividends and the future stock price.